Collaborative Research Presentation & Report: UN Sustainable Development Goals
——————
Presentation Date: Thursday, Dec 4
Research Report Due: Monday, Dec 8
Assignment Overview
In your research group, you will collaboratively investigate one UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG), comparing how it is addressed in three specific locations:
Your project is two-fold. As a group, you will complete:
A written group report (1,000–1,250 words)
South Asia Territory Options (Select One)
Specify a city or region within your chosen territory (e.g., Mumbai, Colombo, Kathmandu, etc.).
Students are permitted to use AI tools (such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, AI research assistants) as part of their writing and research process for assignments. Any AI use must be transparently disclosed.
How to disclose and cite AI use:
| Goal | Short Summary | |
| 1 | No Poverty
|
End poverty everywhere. |
| 2 | Zero Hunger | End hunger and improve sustainable agriculture. |
| 3 | Good Health & Well-Being | Ensure healthy lives and well-being for all. |
| 4 | Quality Education | Ensure inclusive, quality education for all. |
| 5 | Gender Equality | Achieve gender equality and empower women and girls. |
| 6 | Clean Water & Sanitation | Ensure access to clean water and sanitation. |
| 7 | Affordable & Clean Energy | Provide affordable, sustainable, modern energy. |
| 8 | Decent Work & Economic Growth | Promote full, productive employment and economic growth. |
| 9 | Industry, Innovation & Infrastructure | Build resilient infrastructure and foster innovation. |
| 10 | Reduced Inequalities | Reduce inequality within and among countries. |
| 11 | Sustainable Cities & Communities | Make cities inclusive, safe, resilient, sustainable. |
| 12 | Responsible Consumption & Production | Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns. |
| 13 | Climate Action | Take urgent action to combat climate change. |
| 14 | Life Below Water | Conserve oceans, seas, and marine resources. |
| 15 | Life on Land | Protect land ecosystems, forests, and biodiversity. |
| 16 | Peace, Justice & Strong Institutions | Promote peace, justice, and accountable institutions. |
| 17 | Partnerships for the Goals | Strengthen global partnerships for sustainable development. |
Guidelines
Step 1: Select Your SDG (sustainable development goals)
Review the UN’s 17 SDGs and select one that interests your group.
Step 2: Research Comparative Applications
Step 3: Prepare Your Presentation
Step 4: Write Your Group Report
Criteria |
Description |
Weight |
Exemplar Descriptions |
Research Depth & Content |
Use of primary and secondary sources; SDG analysis across regions |
30% |
Excellent: Deep research; rich primary data from Shimonoseki and other sources; detailed, insightful coverage of SDG issues. Good: Solid research with some use of primary data; mostly complete understanding. Satisfactory: Basic research; limited primary sources and fewer details. Needs Improvement: Superficial or incomplete research; lacks primary data. |
Analysis & Comparison |
Clarity and depth in comparing SDG impacts across locations |
25% |
Excellent: Insightful, well-explained comparisons showing nuanced differences/similarities. Good: Clear comparisons with minor gaps. Satisfactory: Attempts comparison but lacks depth or clarity. Needs Improvement: Little/no comparative analysis, mostly descriptive. |
Presentation Quality |
Organization, engagement, visuals, and timing |
20% |
Excellent: Engaging, well-structured, effective visuals; within time. Good: Clear and organized with visuals; minor engagement issues. Satisfactory: Some organization problems; limited visuals. Needs Improvement: Disorganized or incomplete; few/no visuals or engagement. |
Report Writing & Structure |
Clarity, coherence, MLA citation, length |
20% |
Excellent: Well-written, polished, logically structured; perfect citation; meets length. Good: Mostly clear writing; minor errors in citation or length. Satisfactory: Basic coherence; citation or length issues. Needs Improvement: Poorly organized, many errors, off length. |
Collaboration & Primary Sources |
Group teamwork and integration of Shimonoseki data |
5% |
Excellent: Strong collaboration; meaningful use of Shimonoseki data. Good: Good collaboration and some use of primary data. Satisfactory: Limited collaboration or sporadic primary source use. Needs Improvement: No clear collaboration or primary source use. |